Fatores influentes para a adesão de alunos a sistema de carona dinâmica em campus universitário
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v27i4.1521Keywords:
Carpooling, Dynamic carpooling systems, Transport behavior, Travel sharing.Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the factors influencing carpooling supply by students from Recife Campus of Federal University of Pernambuco. In addition, some efficient measures for carpooling expansion are identified and suggested. Logistic Regression was the analysis method adopted, using categorical, ordinal and quantitative variables selected based on a review of the literature. The results show that changeable factors that are inherent to the carpooling arrangement and psychological factors are more related to dynamic systems. While the only fixed criterion that affects the probability of using the proposed system is the user's gender, six system intrinsic criteria are significant: i) the user's profile; ii) the possibility of being a passenger through the system; iii) environmental issues; iv) greater social interaction; v) reduction of flexibility; and vi) sharing trips with strangers. It is concluded that carpooling use can be raised by the adoption of dynamic carpooling systems. Furthermore, along the trips connection systems, it is important to assume informative and educational policies in order to encourage changes in travel behaviour and promote carpooling.Downloads
References
ABRAHAMSE, W. e KEALL, M. (2012) Effectiveness of a web-based intervention to encourage carpooling to work: A case study of Wellington. New Zealand. Transport Policy, v. 21, p. 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.005
AGATZ, N.; ERERA, A.; SAVELSBERGH, M. e WANG, X. (2012) Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 223, n. 2, p. 295-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.028
AGATZ, N.; ERERA, A.; SAVELSBERGH, M. e WANG, X. (2011) Dynamic ride-sharing: A simulation study in metro Atlanta. Transportation Research Part B, v. 45, n. 9, p. 1450-1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.05.017
AJZEN, I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processess, v. 50, n. 2, p. 179-211. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. BANISTER, D. e
MARSHALL, S. (2000) Encouraging transport alternatives. Good practice in reducing travel. The Stationery Office, Norwich. URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/0117023884.
BONSALL, P. W.; SPENCER, A. H. e TANG, W.S. (1984) What makes a car-sharer? Transportation, v. 12, p. 117-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167372
BRUGLIERI, M.; Ciccarellib, D.; Colornia, A. e Luè, A. (2012) PoliUniPool: a carpooling system for universities. Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 20, n. 2011, p. 558-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.062
BULIUNG, R. N.; SOLTYS, K.; HABEL, C. e LANYON, R. (2009) The “Driving” Factors behind Successful Carpool Formation and Use. Transportation, v. 651, n. August, p. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3141/2118-05
CHEN, X. M.; ZAHIRI, M. e ZHANG, S. (2017) Understanding ridesplitting behavior of on-demand ride services : An ensemble learning approach. Transportation Research Part C, v. 76, p. 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.12.018
CIARI, F. e AXHAUSEN, K. W. (2011) Choosing carpooling or carsharing as a mode: Swiss stated choice experiments (I). Arbeitsbericht Verkehrs und Raumplanung. Zurique, Suíça.
COOLS, M.; TORMANS, H.; BRIERS, S. e TELLER, J. (2013) Unravelling the determinants of carpool behaviour in Flanders, Belgium: Integration of qualitative and quantitative research. Anais do BIVEC/GIBET Transport Research Day. Hesse, M.; G. Caruso; P. Gerber e F. Viti (eds.). Zelzate: University Press.
CORREIA, G. e VIEGAS, J. M. (2011) Carpooling and carpool clubs: Clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, v. 45, n. 2, p. 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.11.001
CRÉNO, L. (2014) Energy Consumption and Autonomous Driving . Anais do 3rd CESA Automotive Electronics Congress. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19818-7
CRÉNO, L. e CAHOUR, B. (2014) Chronicles of Lived Experiences for studying the process of trust building in carpooling. Anais do European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1145/2637248.2637255
DELHOMME, P. e GHEORGHIU, A. (2016) Comparing French carpoolers and non-carpoolers: Which factors contribute the most to carpooling? Transportation Research Part D, v. 42, p. 1-15. Acesso em: 07 Jun. 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.10.014
FELSON, M. e SPAETH, J. L. (1978) Community Structure and Collaborative Consumption: A Routine Activity Approach. The American Behavioral Scientist, v. 21, n. 4, p. 164. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427802100411
GARDNER, B. e ABRAHAM, C. (2008) Psychological correlates of car use: A meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, v. 11, n. 4, p. 300-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.01.004
GARGIULO, E.; GIANNANTONIOA, R.; GUERCIOA, E.; BOREANA, C. e Zenezinib, G. (2015) Dynamic ride sharing service: are users ready to adopt it? Procedia Manufacturing, v. 3, p. 777-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.329
GUJARATI, D. N. e PORTER, D. C. (2008) Econometria Básica. 5. ed., Mc Gram Hill. Bookman, Nova York. ISRN: 078.85.8055.051.1.
LI, J.; EMBRY, P.; MATTINGLY, S. P.; SADABADI, K. F.; RASMIDATTA, I. e BURRIS, M. W. (2008) Who Chooses to Carpool and Why? Examination of Texas Carpoolers. Transportation Research Record, v. 2021, p. 110-117. https://doi.org/10.3141/2021-13
NEOH, J. G.; CHIPULU, M. e MARSHALL, A. (2015) What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis. Transportation, n. 16 September 2015, p. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9661-7
PENNDOT - Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (2016) PACOMMUTES (Alternative Transportation in Pennsylvania). Disponível em: http://www.pacommutes.com/ridesharing/car-pooling/. Acesso em: 16 fev.
POSEN, H. A. (2015) Ridesharing in the Sharing Economy: Should Regulators Impose Uber Regulations on Uber? Iowa Law Review, v. 101, n. 1, p. 405-433. Disponível em: https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-19-issue-1/ridesharing-in-the-sharing-economy-should-regulators-impose-ueber-regulations-on-uber/. Acesso em: 07 Jun. 19.
SCHWANEN, T. e LUCAS, K. (2011) Understanding Auto Motives. In: Emerald Group Publishing Limited (eds.) Auto Motives: Understanding Car Use Behaviours. Reino Unido. ISBN: 978-0-85-724233-4. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780857242341-001
SHINDE, T. e THOMBRE, B. (2015) An Effective Approach for Solving Carpool Service Problems Using Genetic Algorithm Approach in Cloud Computing. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, v. 3, n. 12, p. 29-33. Disponível em: http://www.ijarcsms.com/docs/paper/volume2/issue11/V2I11-0031.pdf. Acesso em: 07 Jun. 19
SILVA, L. A.; ANDRADE, M. e MAIA, M. L. (2018) How does the ride-hailing systems demand affect individual transport regulation? Research in Transportation Economics, v. 69, p. 600-606.
TAHMASSEBY, S.; KATTAN, L. e BARBOUR, B. (2016) Propensity to participate in a peer-to-peer social-network-based carpooling system. Journal of Advanced Transportation, v. 50, n. August 2015, p. 240-254. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1326
TEZCAN, H. O. (2016) Potential of Carpooling among Unfamiliar Users: Case of Undergraduate Students at Istanbul Technical University. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, v. 142, n. 1, p. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000283
WAERDEN, P. V. D.; LEM, A. e SCHAEFER, W. (2015) Investigation of factors that stimulate car drivers to change from car to carpooling in city center oriented work trips. Transportation Research Procedia, v. 10, n. July, p. 335-344. Acesso em: 07 Jun. 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.083
WANG, T. e CHEN, C. (2012) Attitudes, mode switching behavior, and the built environment: A longitudinal study in the Puget Sound Region. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, v. 46, n. 10, p. 1594-1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.08.001
ZHOU, J. (2012) Sustainable commute in a car-dominant city: Factors affecting alternative mode choices among university students. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, v. 46, n. 7, p. 1013-1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant TRANSPORTES the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of this journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in TRANSPORTES.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication of the article. Authors are encouraged to use links to TRANSPORTES (e.g., DOIs or direct links) when posting the article online, as TRANSPORTES is freely available to all readers.
- Authors have secured all necessary clearances and written permissions to published the work and grant copyright under the terms of this agreement. Furthermore, the authors assume full responsibility for any copyright infringements related to the article, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding copyright infringement.
- Authors assume full responsibility for the contents of the article submitted for review, including all necessary clearances for divulgation of data and results, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding to this aspect.
