Atraso de pedestres em travessias semaforizadas: uma comparação entre as modelagens pelo HCM e pelo microssimulador VISSIM

Authors

  • Lisel Expósito Martín Universidade Federal do Ceará/ Departamento de Engenharia de Transportes
  • Talyson Pereira Bandeira Universidade Federal do Ceará/ Departamento de Engenharia de Transportes
  • Davi Garcia Lopes Pinto Universidade Federal do Ceará/ Departamento de Engenharia de Transportes
  • Manoel Mendonça de Castro Neto Universidade Federal do Ceará/ Departamento de Engenharia de Transportes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v27i1.1581

Keywords:

Pedestrian modeling, Signalized pedestrian crossings

Abstract

With increasing attention to non-motorized modes of transportation, the modeling of pedestrian traffic on urban crossings has been increasingly investigated in the literature. One of the main measures of effectiveness used to evaluate the operational performance of pedestrian crossings is delay, which is defined as the time that a pedestrian waits before crossing. Two of the major modeling approaches for estimating the average pedestrian delay are those presented by the Highway Capacity Manual – HCM, and those used by simulation software, such as VISSIM. The main objective of this work is to compare these two tools to estimate the average delay per pedestrian in signalized crossings. For this, two crossings of an intersection located in the city of Fortaleza were analyzed.  It was concluded that the higher the degree of pedestrian’s violation of the red light, the better the estimation by VISSIM in comparison to that performed by HCM.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bönisch, C. e T. Kretz (2009) Simulation of Pedestrian Crossing Street. Disponível em: <https://arxiv.org/pdf/0911.2902.pdf> (acesso em 18/04/2019). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1843.7842

Chandra, S.; R. Rastogi e V. Das (2014) Descriptive and parametric analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance in mixed traffic conditions. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, v. 18, n. 1, p. 284–293. DOI: 10.1007/s12205-014-0363-z

Dommes, A.; M.-A. Granié; M.-S. Cloutier; C. Coquelet e F. H.-Richard (2015) Red light violations by adult pedestrians and other safety-related behaviors at signalized crosswalks. Accident Analysis and Prevention, v. 80, p. 67–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.002

Guo, H.; Z. Gao; X. Yang e X. Jiang (2011) Modeling pedestrian violation behavior at signalized crosswalks in China: A hazards-based duration approach. Traffic Injury Prevention, v. 12, n. 1, p. 96–103. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2010.518652

Helbing, D. e P. Molnár (1995) Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E, v. 51, n. 5, p. 4282–4286

Ishaque, M. M. e R. B. Noland, (2011) Pedestrian and Vehicle Flow Calibration in Multimodal Traffic Microsimulation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, v.135, n. 6, p. 338-348. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:6(338)

Jacobsen, A. e H. B. B. Cybis (2011) Microssimulação da travessia de pedestres : coleta de dados para calibração de modelos. Transportes, v. 19, p. 79–86. DOI:10.14295/transportes.v19i2.509

Kadali, B.; P. Vedagiri e N. Rathi (2015) Models for pedestrian gap acceptance behaviour analysis at unprotected mid-block crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, v. 32, p. 114–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.05.006

Koh, P. P. e Y. D. Wong (2014) Gap acceptance of violators at signalised pedestrian crossings. Accident Analysis and Prevention, v. 62, p. 178–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.020

Marysaminathan, S. e P. Vedagiri (2013) Modeling Pedestrian Delay at Signalized Intersection Crosswalks under Mixed Traffic Condition. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 104, p. 708-717. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.165

Marysaminathan, S. e P. Vedagiri (2017) Modeling Pedestrian Level of Service at Signalized Intersection Under Mixed Traffic Conditions. Transportation Research Record, v. 2634, p. 86-94. DOI: 10.3141/2634-13

Onelcin, P. e Y. Alver (2015) Illegal crossing behavior of pedestrian at signalized intersections: Factors affecting the gap acceptance. Transportation Research Part F, v. 31, p. 124-132. DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.007.

Onelcin, P. e Y. Alver (2017) The crossing speed and safety margin of pedestrians at signalized intersections. Transportation Research Procedia, v. 22, p. 3-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.002.

PTV (2016) Vissim 9 User Manual. Karlsruhe, Germany.

Rouphail, N.; J. Hummer; J. Milazzo e D. Allen (1998) Recommended Procedures Chapeter 13, “Pedestrian”, of the Highway Capacity Manual. Report FHWA-RD-98-107. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

Siti, N. N. M.; D. B. Daniel; R. Hamidun; A. Walid; R. Munzilah; P. Joewono; A. M. Yusri e A. Kamarudin (2017) Analysis of Pedestrian Gap Acceptance and Crossing Decision in Kuala Lumpur. MATEC Web of Conferences. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201710308014

Suh, W.; D. Henclewood; A. Greenwood; A. Guin; R. Guensler; M. P. Hunter e R. Fujimoto (2013) Modeling pedestrian crossing activities in an urban environment using microscopic traffic simulation. Simulation, v. 89, n. 2, pp 213-224. DOI: 10.1177/0037549712469843

TRB (2016) Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition. Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.

Wiedemann, R. e U. Reiter (1992) Microscopic Traffic Simulation: The Simulation System MISSION. Project ICARUS (V1052). Final Report, p. 1-53.

Ye, X.; J. Chen; G. Jiang e X. Yan (2015) Modeling pedestrian level of service at signalized intersection crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions. TRB 94th Annual Meeting. Whashington D.C. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.165

Downloads

Published

2019-04-30

How to Cite

Expósito Martín, L., Pereira Bandeira, T., Lopes Pinto, D. G., & de Castro Neto, M. M. (2019). Atraso de pedestres em travessias semaforizadas: uma comparação entre as modelagens pelo HCM e pelo microssimulador VISSIM. TRANSPORTES, 27(1), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v27i1.1581

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Artigos

License

Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant TRANSPORTES the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of this journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in TRANSPORTES.

  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication of the article. Authors are encouraged to use links to TRANSPORTES (e.g., DOIs or direct links) when posting the article online, as TRANSPORTES is freely available to all readers.

  4. Authors have secured all necessary clearances and written permissions to published the work and grant copyright under the terms of this agreement. Furthermore, the authors assume full responsibility for any copyright infringements related to the article, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding copyright infringement.

  5. Authors assume full responsibility for the contents of the article submitted for review, including all necessary clearances for divulgation of data and results, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding to this aspect.