Mechanical and hydraulic properties of nonwoven geotextiles impregnated with asphalt emulsion after damage simulations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58922/transportes.v31i2.2809

Keywords:

Geosynthetics, Reinforced road, Impregnation, Durability, Reduction factor, Asphalt emulsion

Abstract

This study evaluates nonwoven geotextiles’ mechanical and hydraulic properties impregnated with asphalt emulsion after simulating installation damage in laboratory conditions. Besides the damage method recommended by ISO 10722, this study considered two static load applications. Two types of nonwoven geotextiles (polyester and polypropylene fibres) were investigated in different conditions regarding i) impregnation with asphalt emulsion, ii) loading condition, and iii) bedding material. The properties evaluated before and after damage consisted of ultimate tensile strength, elongation at break, secant stiffness at 2% strain, and permittivity. The results revealed that the impregnation increased the geotextiles’ ultimate tensile strength and secant tensile stiffness but decreased their elongation at break and permittivity. Overall, the geotextiles show good resistance to the installation damage investigated, but after impregnation, the polypropylene geotextile showed to be more sensitive to the damage. The asphalt emulsion composition proved to be important to the geotextiles’ properties and response after damage. It can be concluded that the impregnation improved the geotextiles’ mechanical properties, but the impregnation effects on the geotextiles’ permittivity and resistance to installation damage should be carefully quantified and analysed for design purposes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, T.M. and R.J. Bathurst (1994) Characterization of geostynthetic load-strain behavior after installation damage. Geosynthetics International, v. 1, n. 2, p. 181-99. DOI: 10.1680/gein.1.0008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.1.0008

ASTM (2005) ASTM D 6140: Standard Test Method to Determine Asphalt Retention of Paving Fabrics Used in Asphalt Paving for Full-Width Applications.” West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

ASTM (2011) ASTM D 5035: Standard Test Method for Breaking Force and Elongation of Textile Fabrics (Strip Method). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

ASTM (2012) ASTM D 5199: Standard Test Method for Measuring the Nominal Thickness of Geosynthetics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

ASTM (2013) ASTM D5/D5M - Standard Test Method for Penetrarion of Betuminous Materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

ASTM (2016) ASTM D 6934: Standard Test Method for Residue by Evaporation of Emulsified Asphalt. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

ASTM (2017a) ASTM D 4491: Standard Test Methods for Water Permeability of Geotextiles by Permittivity. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

ASTM (2017b) ASTM D 7496: Standard Test Method for Viscosity of Emulsified Asphalt by Saybolt Furol Viscometer. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

ASTM (2018) ASTM D 5261: Standard Test Method for Measuring Mass Per Unit of Geosynthetic Clay Liners. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

Carlos, D.M.; J.R. Carneiro and M.L. Lopes (2019) Effect of different aggregates on the mechanical damage suffered by geotextiles. Materials (Basel), v. 12, n. 24, p. 15. DOI: 10.3390/ma12244229. PMid:31861058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244229

Carlos, D.M.; J.R. Carneiro; M. Pinho-Lopes et al. (2015) Effect of soil grain size distribution on the mechanical damage of nonwoven geotextiles under repeated loading. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-7. DOI: 10.1007/s40891-015-0011-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-015-0011-9

Carneiro, J.R.; L.M. Morais; S.P. Moreira et al. (2013) Evaluation of the damages occurred during the installation of nonwoven geotextiles. Materials Science Forum, v. 730–732, p. 439-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.730-732.439

Ching-Chuan, H. and C. Shuay-Luen (2006) Investigation of installation damage of some geogrid using laboratory tests, Geosynthetics International, v. 13, n. 1, p. 23-35. DOI: 10.1680/gein.2006.13.1.23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2006.13.1.23

Correia, N.S. and J.G. Zornberg (2014) Influence of tack coat rate on the properties of paving geosynthetics. Transportation Geotechnics, v. 1, n. 1, p. 45-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.01.002

Correia, N.S.; J.G. Zornberg and B.S. Bueno (2014) Behavior of impregnated paving geotextiles: study of optimum tack coat rate. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, v. 26, n. 11, p. 04014077. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001026

Domiciano, M.L.; E.C.G. Santos and J.L. Silva (2020) Geogrid mechanical damage caused by Recycled Construction and Demolition Waste (RCDW): influence of grain size distribution. Soils and Rocks, v. 43, n. 2, p. 231-246. DOI: 10.28927/SR.432231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.432231

Fleury, M.P.; M.A. Lima; E.C.G. Santos et al. (2023) Geotextile resistance to cyclic and static loading damage when impregnated with asphalt emulsion. Construction & Building Materials, v. 363, n. 129738, p. 14. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129738

Gonzalez-Torre, I.; M.A. Calzada-Perez; A. Vega-Zamanillo et al.(2014) Damage evaluation during installation of geosynthetics used in asphalt pavements. Geosynthetics International, v. 21, n. 6, p. 377-386. DOI: 10.1680/gein.14.00025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.14.00025

Huang, C. and Z. Wang (2007) Installation damage of geogrids : influence of load intensity. Geosynthetics International, v. 14, n. 2, p. 65-75. DOI: 10.1680/gein.2007.14.2.65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2007.14.2.65

Hufenus, R.; R. Rüegger; D. Flum et al. (2005) Strength reduction factors due to installation damage of reinforcing geosynthetics. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, v. 23, n. 5, p. 401-424. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.02.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.02.003

ISO (2007) ISO 10722: Geosynthetics - Index Test Procedure for the Evaluation of Mechanical Damage under Repeated Loading - Damage Caused by Granular Material. Geneva: ISO.

Izadi, E.; T. Decraene; S. De Strijcker et al. (2018) A laboratory investigation on the impact resistance of a woven geotextile. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, v. 46, n. 1, p. 91-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.10.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.10.003

Koerner, R.M. (2005) Designing With Geosynthetics (5th ed.). New Jersey: Person Education.

Kondo, H.; T. Tanaka; T. Masuda et al. (1992) Aggin effects in 16 years on mechanicla properties of commercial polymers. Pure and Applied Chemistry, v. 64, n. 12, p. 1945-1958. DOI: 10.1351/pac199264121945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199264121945

Norambuena-Contreras, J. and I. Gonzalez-Torre (2015) Influence of geosynthetic type on retarding cracking in asphalt pavements. Construction & Building Materials, v. 78, p. 421-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.034

Obando-Ante, J. and E.M. Palmeira (2015) A laboratory study on the performance of geosynthetic reinforced asphalt overlays. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s40891-014-0007-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-014-0007-x

Paula, A.M.; M. Pinho-Lopes and M.L. Lopes (2004) Damage during installation laboratory test. Influence of the type of granular material. In German Geotechnical Society and The Technical University of Munich (orgs.) 3rd European Geosynthetics Conference. Munich: German Geotechnical Society, p. 603-606.

Pinho-Lopes, M. and M.L. Lopes (2014) Tensile properties of geosynthetics after installation damage. Environmental Geotechnics, v. 1, n. 3, p. 161-78. DOI: 10.1680/envgeo.13.00032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/envgeo.13.00032

Pinho-Lopes, M.; A.M. Paula and M.L. Lopes (2018) Long-term response and design of two geosynthetics: effect of field installation damage. Geosynthetics International, v. 25, n. 1, p. 98-117. DOI: 10.1680/jgein.17.00036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.17.00036

Reinert, J. and R. Kerry Rowe (2021) Aging of geotextiles used in landfill applications - an initial study. In 4th Pan American Conference on Geosynthetics - GeoAmericas 2020. Rio de Janeiro: IGS.

Rowe, R.K.; S. Rimal and H. Sangam (2009) Ageing of HDPE geomembrane exposed to air, water and leachate at different temperatures Q. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, v. 27, n. 2, p. 137-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.09.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.09.007

Wang, J.; F. Xiao; Z. Chen et al. (2017) Application of tack coat in pavement engineering. Construction & Building Materials, v. 152, p. 856-871. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.056

Wickert, F. (2003) Fatores de Influência no Comportamento de Camadas Anti-Reflexão de Trincas com Geossintéticos. Dissertation (master of science). Engenharia de Infra-Estrutura Aeronáutica, Instituto Tecnológico da Aeronáutica, São José dos Campos, SP. Available at: <http://www.bdita.bibl.ita.br/> (accessed 05/18/2023).

Zamora-Barraza, D.; M.A. Calzada-Pérez; D. Castro-Fresno et al. (2011) Evaluation of anti-reflective cracking systems using geosynthetics in the interlayer zone. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, v. 29, n. 2, p. 130-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.005

Downloads

Published

2023-08-23

How to Cite

Aguiar Lima, M. ., Fleury, M., Lins da Silva, J., & Carlos Guedes dos Santos, E. (2023). Mechanical and hydraulic properties of nonwoven geotextiles impregnated with asphalt emulsion after damage simulations. TRANSPORTES, 31(2), e2809. https://doi.org/10.58922/transportes.v31i2.2809

Issue

Section

Artigos