(Micro)mobility by electric scooters: psychometric assessment of the importance of built environment attributes to mode choice in Belo Horizonte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58922/transportes.v31i3.2913Keywords:
E-scooter, Micromobility, Likert scale, Method of successive intervalsAbstract
The emergence of e-scooter (ES) sharing systems in Belo Horizonte, as well as in other urban centers around the world, has brought attention to a new way of getting around cities. While the occurrence of crashes involving micromobility vehicles is relatively small compared to the number of trips taken, it has sparked efforts from various stakeholders to understand how urban spaces can be optimized to maximize opportunities and minimize risks. This study focuses on evaluating the importance of built environment characteristics for individuals choosing to ride ES, according to the perception of those who are familiar with Belo Horizonte. Drawing from Bikeability indicators as a foundation, an online survey based on the Likert scale was applied. The results indicate that the predominant profile of ES users aligns with existing literature, consisting of young adult males with higher incomes and education levels. Although 82% of respondents expressed an interest in using ES, 61% noted that the city lacks the necessary conditions to support its operation. Utilizing the Method of Successive Intervals (MSI), the study identifies pavement condition and the presence of dedicated bike lanes as the most influential factors impacting ES usage.
Downloads
References
Aasebo, H.K.W. (2019) Shared Micro Mobility: What is Happening in our Streets? Master’s thesis. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo. Oslo. Available at: <https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/69645/7/AaseboHaakon.pdf> (accessed 04/26/2021).
Bagno, P.; L.D.A.P. Almeida; L. Cardoso et al. (2019) A ciclabilidade sob a ótica de ciclistas: proposta metodológica para elaboração de um índice para Belo Horizonte. In Congresso Brasileiro de Mobilidade Urbana – ARENA ANTP. São Paulo: ANTP.
Bannister, D. (2007) The sustainable mobility paradigm, Transport Policy, v. 15, n. 2, p. 73-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
Barros, R.M.; L.T.A. Souza; V.C.O. Couto et al. (2021) Avaliação de indicadores de caminhabilidade a partir da perspectiva de pedestres: um estudo para Belo Horizonte. In IX Congresso Luso Brasileiro para o Planejamento,
Urbano, Regional, Integrado e Sustentável. Bauru: UNESP/FAAC, p. 1070.
Belo Horizonte (2021) Consulta Pública Nº 004/2021 – Minuta do Decreto: Regulamenta os Sistemas de Compartilhamento de Equipamentos destinados à Mobilidade Ativa e Micromobilidade, por meio de Autorização, no âmbito do Município de Belo Horizonte e dá outras providências. Prefeitura de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte.
BH em Ciclo (2019) Relatório Analítico do Índice de Desenvolvimento da Estrutura Cicloviária IDECiclo – Belo Horizonte, 2018/2019. Associação dos Ciclistas Urbanos de Belo Horizonte. Available at: <https://bhemciclo.org/ideciclobh/> (accessed 04/26/2021).
Bruxelles. (2019) Bruxelles Mobilité Enquête sur l’usage des Trottinettes Électriques à Bruxelles. Bruxelles, Belgique: SPRB.
Cardoso, L. (2007) Transporte Público, Acessibilidade Urbana e Desigualdades Socioespaciais na Região Metropolitana de Belo Horizonte. Doctoral Thesis. Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte. Available at: <http://hdl.handle.net/1843/MPBB-7A2N6A> (accessed 04/26/2021).
Carvalho, I.R.V. (2018) Caminhabilidade como Instrumento de Mobilidade Urbana: Um Estudo de Caso em Belo Horizonte. Master’s Thesis. Escola de Engenharia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte. Available at: <http://hdl.handle.net/1843/RAOA-BAPPDF> (accessed 04/26/2021).
Cervero, R. and K. Kockelman (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design, Transportation Research Part D, Transport and Environment, v. 2, n. 3, p. 199-219. DOI: 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
CETIC (2018) TIC Domicílios 2018: Pesquisa Sobre o Uso das Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação nos Domicílios Brasileiros. São Paulo: CETIC. Available at: <https://www.cetic.br/pesquisa/domicilios/publicacoes> (accessed 04/26/2021).
Diniz, L.L.E. (2017) Priorização das Características de Qualidade do Transporte Público por Ônibus sob a Ótica dos Usuários do Transporte Individual Motorizado: Aplicação do Método QFD. Master’s thesis. Escola de Engenharia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte. Available at: <http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-ASAHAX> (accessed 04/26/2021).
Ewing, R. and R. Cervero (2010) Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis, Journal of the American Planning Association, v. 76, n. 3, p. 265-94. DOI: 10.1080/01944361003766766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
Ferreira, R. G.; L. Cardoso; A. A. Souza et al.(2017) Avaliação do nível de satisfação dos usuários de um sistema de informações sobre tráfego e transportes: o caso do Portal BHTRANS. Revista dos Transportes Públicos - ANTP, v. 39, p. 29-48.
Fitt, H. and A. Curl (2019) E-scooter Use in New Zealand: Insights Around Some Frequently Asked Questions. Christchurch: University of Canterburry. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13510.93761.
Guilford, J.P. (1975) Psychometric Methods. (2nd ed.). London: Mc-Graw Hill PublishingCo.
Handy, S.L.; M.G. Boarnet; R. Ewing et al. (2002) How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, v. 23, n. 2, p. 64-73. DOI: /10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0. PMid:12133739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
Heinen, E.; K. Maat and B. Van Wee (2011) ‘The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances’, Transportation Research Part D, Transport and Environment, v. 16, n. 2, p. 102-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.08.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.08.010
Herrman, M. (2019) A Comprehensive Guide to Electric Scooter Regulation Practice. Master’s thesis. Departamento de Paisagismo, Arquitetura e Planejamento Urbano, Universidade do Estado de Kansas, Manhattan. Available at: <http://hdl.handle.net/2097/39655> (accessed 04/26/2021).
Hollingsworth, J.; B. Copeland and J.X. Johnson (2019) Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters, Environmental Research Letters, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1-10. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8
Hora, H.R.M.; G.T.R. Monteiro and J. Arica (2010) ‘Confiabilidade em questionários para qualidade: Um estudo com Coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach’, Produto & Produção, v. 11, n. 2, p. 85-103. DOI: 10.22456/1983-8026.9321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1983-8026.9321
ITDP (2017) Guia de Planejamento Cicloinclusivo. Available at: <https://itdpbrasil.org/guia-cicloinclusivo/ > (accessed 04/26/2021).
Jacobs, J. (2011) Morte e Vida de Grandes Cidades (3. ed.). São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes.
Januzzi, P.M. (2002) Indicadores Sociais na Formulação e Avaliação de Políticas Públicas. p. 1-9. Available at: < https://www.nescon.medicina.ufmg.br/biblioteca/registro/Indicadores_sociais_na_formulacao_e_avaliacao_de_po liticas_publicas/62> (acessed: 04/26/2021).
Jiao, J. and S. Bai (2020) Understanding the shared e-scooter travels in Austin, TX, ISPRS International Journal of GeoInformation, v. 9, n. 2, p. 135. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9020135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020135
Lucchesi, S.T.; R.R. Candido; S.P. Schwabe et al. (2019) A mobilidade urbana brasileira inclui ações em prol da smart mobility em seu planejamento? Uma avaliação qualitativa dos termos de smart mobility nos planos de mobilidade. In XXXIII Congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes da ANPET. Balneário: ANPET, p. 449-460.
Lyons, G. (2018) Getting smart about urban mobility: aligning the paradigms of smart and sustainable, Transportation Research Part A, Policy and Practice, v. 115, p. 4-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.12.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.12.001
Matthew, J.K.; M. Liu; S. Seeder et al. (2019) Analysis of E-Scooter trips and their temporal usage patterns. ITE Journal, v. 89, n. 6, p. 44-9.
McKenzie, G. (2019) Urban mobility in the sharing economy: a spatiotemporal comparison of shared mobility services, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, v. 79, p. 101418. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101418
NACTO (2020) NACTO: City Transportation Action Update. Available at: <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xBf6gMAwNSzNTr0- CbK_uTA0ZapWGiOP58Dfn6qeC6Y/edit#gid=1511672872> (accessed 04/26/2021).
Orr, B.; J. MacArthur and J. Dill (2019) The Portland E-Scooter Experience. Available at: <https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/trec_seminar/163> (accessed 04/26/2021).
Platt, L. and G. Rybarczyk (2021) Skateboarder and scooter-rider perceptions of the urban environment: a qualitative analysis of user-generated content, Urban Geography, v. 42, n. 10, p. 1525-51. DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2020.1811554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1811554
Providelo, J.K. and S.P. Sanches (2011) Roadway and traffic characteristics for bicycling, Transportation, v. 38, n. 5, p. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9353-x
Queiroz, C.S. (2020) ‘Patinetes elétricos e o direito urbanístico: o uso dos patinetes elétricos como instrumento de mobilidade urbana’, Revista de Educação do Vale do Arinos, v. 7, n. 1, p. 29-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30681/relva.v7i1.4278
Reck, D.J.; S. Guidon and K.W. Axhausen (2020) Modelling shared e-scooters in Louisville, Kentucky: a spatial regression approach. In XCIX Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board: New Mobility and
Transportation Technology Takeaways (TRB 2020). Washington: IVT, ETH Zurich.. DOI: 10.3929/ethz-b000371224
Rio de Janeiro (2019) Decreto nº 46.181, de 2 de julho de 2019. Disciplina a utilização da infraestrutura de mobilidade urbana no Município por meio da exploração econômica do compartilhamento de patinetes elétricos, em caráter experimental, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
São Paulo. (2019) Decreto nº 58.906, de 9 de agosto de 2019. Regulamenta os serviços de compartilhamento de patinetes elétricas acionadas por meio de plataformas digitais. Diário Oficial de São Paulo, Ano 64, nº 149, São Paulo.
Segnestam, L. (2002) Indicators of Environmental and Sustainable Development: Theories and Practical Experiences. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Shaheen, S.A.; S. Guzman and H. Zhang (2010) Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: past, present, and future,
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, v. 2143, n. 1, p. 159-67. DOI: 10.3141/2143-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2143-20
St-Louis, E.; K. Manaugh; D. Van Lierop et al. (2014) The happy commuter: a comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, v. 26, p. 160-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.004
Viola, P.D.D. (2017) Potencial de Viagens por Bicicletas em Belo Horizonte em Belo Horizonte: Um Estudo Exploratório da Pesquisa Origem e Destino de 2012. Master’s Thesis. Escola de Engenharia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte. DOI: 10.34096/rtt.i20.6397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34096/rtt.i20.6397
Yang, H.; Q. Ma; Z. Wang et al. (2020) Safety of micro-mobility: analysis of E-Scooter crashes by mining news reports, Accident; Analysis and Prevention, v. 143, p. 105608. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105608. PMid:32480017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105608
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lucas Tadeu Albino Souza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant TRANSPORTES the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of this journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in TRANSPORTES.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication of the article. Authors are encouraged to use links to TRANSPORTES (e.g., DOIs or direct links) when posting the article online, as TRANSPORTES is freely available to all readers.
- Authors have secured all necessary clearances and written permissions to published the work and grant copyright under the terms of this agreement. Furthermore, the authors assume full responsibility for any copyright infringements related to the article, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding copyright infringement.
- Authors assume full responsibility for the contents of the article submitted for review, including all necessary clearances for divulgation of data and results, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding to this aspect.
